April 2, 2021
From The Free

‘The spectacle is vulnerable,’ proclaimed the pamphlet Why Miss World? And so it proved to be on 20 November 1970, when activists from the nascent women’s liberation movement deployed rattles, chants, banners, flour, smoke bombs, stink bombs, ripe tomatoes and bundles of cascading leaflets to disrupt the 1970 Miss World pageant at London’s Albert Hall, in front of a global television audience of a hundred million people.

from ·Red Pepper with thanks.. illustrations added

Why Miss World? Misbehaving

A new edited volume emphasises that the personal is political and highlights the power of spectacular direct action, says Alice Robson

Misbehaving: stories of protest against the Miss World contest and the beauty industry tells the stories of those who took part in the action in their own words, but does much more than merely record the night’s events, with writers sharing what brought them to the movement and how it changed their lives. In doing so, it contributes to our understanding of 1970s struggles, and to questions that resonate beyond that historical moment.

binary comment

What leads us to join political campaigns? What sustains our involvement? What is the role of our individual and collective memories of mutual struggle?

Guardian reporter Nicholas de Jongh,  who was covering the event, wrote: “Sixty seconds noisy, smelly pandemonium reigned. I was hit by  a bag of flour, tied in a paper packet. My shirt, suit and hands were splattered with blue paint. Bob Hope retreated, unable to compete with this newer, and frankly more interesting, entertainment.”

Reflecting the movement itself, these accounts fuse the personal and political.

Painful memories of childhood and teenage years take their place alongside happier recollections. Many contributors followed a path from grammar school to university, the first in their family to do so.

They were active in late 1960s political struggles: showing solidarity with Cuba and Latin American political exiles, opposing apartheid and the war in Vietnam. The left they encountered was male-dominated, replete with ‘leather-jacketed, smoke-filled egotistical bombast’. In the aftermath of the 1968 ‘summer of love’, many men expected women to be sexually available on demand.

Women’s liberation was the first time that these activists had organised around their own lives, and it was transformative. Reading Misbehaving brought back the thrill of my own discovery of feminism, the new understanding that came from reading the theories these women forged from their collective experiences.

The Miss World protest was a turning point for the movement, leading to a surge in participation, but the 1970 competition held other significance. Previous contest winners had all been white, reflecting and projecting racialised images of beauty.

After protesters vacated the Albert Hall, Jennifer Hosten of Grenada became the first black woman to be crowned Miss World. Incredibly, the organisers had allowed apartheidera South Africa to enter two contestants, one black and one white: the former, Pearl Jansen, was runner-up.

It’s hard to imagine a contemporary parallel for the action’s reach: a spectacle that disrupted prime-time family entertainment

Misbehaving sometimes makes for uncomfortable reading. A distance of 50 years didn’t lessen my revulsion at hearing that pageant host Bob Hope bragged about taking the winner to Vietnam to ‘give the GIs the hots’. It feels like a triumph when he’s driven from the stage.

Successive chapters stress that the protest targeted organisers who profited from the contest and the patriarchal capitalist system it represented, not the contestants themselves.

Yet presenting the competitors as the embodiment of that system leaves little room for their agency. Misbehaving forces consideration of the many ways in which women are pitted against each other, which extend far beyond the beauty contest.

It’s hard to imagine a contemporary parallel for the action’s reach: a spectacle that disrupted a spectacle marketed and consumed as prime-time family entertainment. Afterwards, many of the protesters put their energies into collective solutions to the material needs of themselves and other women, establishing food co-ops, community nurseries and claimants’ unions.

Jillian Jessup and Pearl Janssen

Jillian Jessup and Pearl Janssen, Miss South Africa and Miss Africa South 1970. JW: Pearl’s success as a runner-up didn’t really change her life, did it?HB:  No, and the thing about that is it’s not really a consequence of a beauty contest, but apartheid South Africa.

It didn’t materially change her life because after her year as Miss Africa South, she just went back to being somebody who was living in a township and now didn’t have the machinist’s job she’d had because she’d given it up and people thought she was rich now. She’s never had money.

Jane Grant explains: ‘We wanted to draw a line under the spectacular direct action of the Miss World protest and concentrate more on working in the community and building a movement.’ Communal living, mutual aid and feminist friendship permeate the accounts as crucial to sustaining their involvement in women’s liberation, supporting them across their lives.

Jo Robinson and Sarah Wilson of the Women’s Liberation Movement

Sally again:“We leapt up. I had to climb over people who were horrified at what we were doing.  I was certainly determined to get onto that stage and disrupt. When I first leapt up I could see Bob Hope looked absolutely horrified and ran back stage. He took a long time to be persuaded to come  back on.” She  was seized by four or five policemen  and carried out by her arms and legs. “As we were being dragged out some of the Miss World contestants, beautiful young women  in all  their baubles,  were saying “Let them go” to the policemen!”

‘We’re not beautiful, we’re not ugly, we’re angry!’ was the defining slogan of the Miss World protest. As much as the anger, it is the optimism, creativity and fun of the early women’s liberation movement that rise from the pages of Misbehaving.

Misbehaving: stories of protest against the Miss World contest and the beauty industry is edited by Sue Finch, Jenny Fortune, Jane Grant, Jo Robinson and Sarah Wilson and published by Merlin Press

Source: Thefreeonline.wordpress.com