January 20, 2022
From Popular Resistance
164 views

Above Photo: Ola Bini during a legal proceeding related to his case.

According to the defense team representing Ola Bini in Ecuador, the pre-trial process alone was littered with over 65 due process violations, prompting rights groups both within and outside Ecuador demanding charges be dropped against him.

The trial against Ola Bini, Swedish software developer and digital rights activist, is scheduled to begin on Wednesday, January 19, and continue for three days. The long-awaited trial comes after multiple delays, recusal of judges, documented harassment and surveillance of Bini, and constant shifting of charges from the prosecution leading to serious allegations of political interference in the case.

In the meanwhile, digital rights advocacy groups and progressive media outlets are pushing for the Ecuadorian authorities to ensure a fair trial, that is not only free from political interference, but also made in “accordance with the law and expert technical criteria.”

A group of observers, representing Regional Foundation for Human Rights Advisory (INREDH) and Observatory of Rights and Justice (ODJ), along with a coalition of rights groups and journalists from independent media outlets, will be attending the trial, to make sure that Bini is guaranteed his right to a fair trial.

Bini was arrested in April 2019 in the Quito airport by Ecuadorian authorities, just hours after the forcible expulsion and arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

Irregularities in the case can be traced back to his arrest, as the government did not file charges during or immediately after the arrest, and made baseless public allegations stating that Bini had supposedly conspired with Assange to commit cybercrimes and was a “Russian hacker”. Charges were eventually filed against him much after the arrest.

Since his irregular detention and arrest, Bini’s case was marked with a series of due process violations, which led to his release 70 days after his arrest due to a habeas corpus decision which found his detention illegal. The presiding judge in the case had to be recused, after the defense raised concerns of mistrial owing to political interference from the then Lenin Moreno administration.

The successive pre-trial process, which was finished in June 2021, also ended with a second judge being removed over allegations of “procedural fraud” for causing multiple delays in the pre-trial process.

Before being removed from the case, the judge was able to sanction the trial. The defense and Bini’s supporters have raised questions over the judge’s decision and the reasoning behind the process to sanction the trial. The defense has listed at least 65 due process violations and also argued that the basis of the prosecution’s charges lacks solid evidence. This has been echoed by human rights and computer security advocacy groups as well.






Source: Popularresistance.org