Following a break over Christmas, the trial resumed today of the #Colston4 (see here for past coverage) and most of today was focused on the prosecution and the defence summing-up before the jury considers its verdict.
The prosecutionâs core argument boils down to basically; the rule of law must be obeyed;
This case is not about politics or emotion but the cold rule of law
(Which some may feel that commentary is needed when the current government planned to break the law in a âlimited and specificâ way, oh and also illegally prorogued parliament and so on, so one might note that âthe rule of lawâ argument tends to get âunevenlyâ applied in reality?)
On the defence side of things, they were leaning into the argument about being on the right side of history, an argument used on many, many civil rights trials over the years;
Liam Walker addressing the jury: https://t.co/qwNyQKNfKc
â Countering Colston (@CounterColston) January 4, 2022
Walker states â ‘The four people on trial here are not professional protesters or trouble-makers and neither were the others who marched âŠ. this was not an act of vandalism, it was an act of solidarity’.
â Ellie Pipe (@eekpipe) January 4, 2022
Colston trial : Tom Wainwright, defending Milo Ponsford, now addressing jury, arguing his client, with others, ‘showed the world the people of Bristol are willing to stand up for what they believe in’. @itvwestcountry
â richardpayneITV (@richardpayneitv) January 4, 2022
Colston 4 trial. Jake Skuse summing up. He believed the people of Bristol owned the statue and would consent to his actions. âI knew the people of Bristol were behind usâ. @CounterColston
â Stephen Clarke (@southvillesteve) January 4, 2022
Colston 4 trial. Milo Ponsford summing up. âIf you have a cancer festering in your body you should cut it out;only once itâs gone can the body heal. This action prompted discussion where there was silence. Bristol is now a beacon showing how to heal communities.â @CounterColston
â Stephen Clarke (@southvillesteve) January 4, 2022
The next stage in the process, is the judge summing up (which has started) and is expected to complete tomorrow, at which point the jury will retire to consider their verdict;
The court is now hearing the judge’s final summary. He reminds the jury to decide the case on the basis of the evidence heard over the course of the trial and begins summarising that evidence.
â Ellie Pipe (@eekpipe) January 4, 2022
Source: Alternativebristol.com